2026-07-31 / Signal #4
Reviewer flagged papers with fake AI-generated authors and hallucinated citations; both accepted as orals anyway (plus widespread slop stats).
“I flagged two papers with obviously fake AI authors. Both got accepted as orals—just fix the names.”
Why It Matters
AI slop actively breaking academic institutions and peer review; weird real-world behavior where fabricated elements survive expert scrutiny, changing how knowledge is produced/validated.
Evidence
Source evidence is in the linked daily scan.
Sources
Daily scan: 2026-07-31