arXiv implements 1-year ban (plus peer-review gate) for papers with incontrovertible hallucinated/fake references.

“Science just banned authors for a year if their AI hallucinates fake citations. The machines are gaslighting peer review.”

9.0Weirdness

Why It Matters

AI slop is so pervasive it's breaking the scientific record; academia responds with author bans and institutional enforcement, changing how prestige, authorship, and knowledge production work. Concrete policy as artifact.

Evidence

Viral tweet by Thomas Dietterich (arXiv CS moderator/former AAAI president, ~3.6k likes, hundreds of reposts/quotes as of May 14-15); tied to recent audit (Zhao et al.) finding 146k+ hallucinated citations in 2025 preprints across arXiv/bioRxiv/SSRN; top HN discussion.

Signal Read

Novelty: 9Receipts: 10Story voltage: 9Heat: 8

Source Trail

Daily scan: 2026-05-15